River Avenue Blues

  • About
    • Privacy Policy
  • Features
    • Yankees Top 30 Prospects
    • Prospect Profiles
    • Fan Confidence
  • Resources
    • 2019 Draft Order
    • Depth Chart
    • Bullpen Workload
    • Guide to Stats
  • Shop and Tickets
    • RAB Tickets
    • MLB Shop
    • Fanatics
    • Amazon
    • Steiner Sports Memorabilia

Beyond Bird and Voit: A primer on the Yankees’ backup first base options

February 21, 2019 by Steven Tydings

Bird. (Adam Hunger/Getty Images)

For the last three seasons, the Yankees have had one of the worst first base situations in baseball.

Greg Bird’s injury history has a lot to do with it. The team is 27th in first base WAR since the start of 2016 with Bird missing all of 2016 and parts of the last two seasons.

While the team still didn’t get elite production at first last season, they were middle of the pack thanks to the unexpected mashing of Luke Voit. The Yankees were 16th in 1B WAR last year and Voit produced 1.9 of it in just 39 games.

However, Voit is far from a sure thing. He had a remarkable 148 plate appearances last year and some projections are bullish on his production, as Bobby noted recently, but is he really a middle-of-the-order masher? There’s a strong chance he’s just a flash in the pan.

And if Voit is a flash in the pan and Bird can’t get back on track, what do the Yankees do? What’s the backup plan? Certainly, they’ll each get every opportunity to win the job, particularly Bird as the lefty-power hitter the lineup needs. But what’s the backup plan?

That’s worth trying to suss out.

1. D.J. LeMahieu

When the Yankees signed LeMahieu in January, it was with the idea that he would be a multi-positional player who could fill in all around the infield. In theory, that’s great. He’s played all the positions before … in 2014.

Since 2014, LeMahieu has been a Gold Glove second baseman and nothing but. He hasn’t played another position and it’s a tremendous question mark whether he can maintain his value as a steady glove when moved to the corner infield. Would his range be a real asset at first? There’s even the question whether his unfamiliarity at first could make him a negative there.

The fielding questions come long before you dive into his hitting. Outside of his batting title in 2016, he’s been a mediocre hitter and worse outside Coors Field. That sounds like more of the same from what the Yankees have gotten at first base.

Then there’s the doomsday scenario: What if Troy Tulowitzki can’t stay healthy or produce while both Voit and Bird fail in short order? LeMahieu would need to shift over to second base to help cover Tulo, forcing the Yankees into keeping a below-average first base situation. Unless you move someone else across the diamond…

Looking for something? (Jim McIsaac/Getty)

2. Miguel Andujar

In that doomsday scenario, Andujar would still need to play third base. But let’s say the team can shift things around and Andujar becomes the backup at first base. Can he even play the position?

Andujar’s foibles at third base are well documented. He struggled on reads, was slow in making throws and didn’t have the proper footwork, leading to errors or balls skirting through the infield. Moving him down the defensive spectrum to first base eliminate some of his throws but places him back into an unfamiliar spot with balls coming at him just as quick. In terms of scooping balls at first, he can’t be too familiar, though that’s hardly a deal breaker after watching Voit butcher a few throws.

Andujar can at least hit the part at first base, but it doesn’t sound like the team is too keen on trying him opposite the hot corner. In his introductory spring press conference, Aaron Boone shied away from committing to Andujar playing any first this spring, so thrusting him into action in the regular season becomes almost out of the question.

So who’s after Andujar?

3. Other in-house options

Seriously, who?

On the active roster, Gary Sanchez and Austin Romine have first base experience in the majors. Sanchez only played three innings there in 2017 and didn’t look all that comfortable. Romine rated well by UZR in 80 innings across 2016 and ’17, but he doesn’t hit at a level of an everyday player.

Aaron Judge and Giancarlo Stanton are likely destined for first base and DH duties late in their career but not in the short term. Both play a capable corner outfield at this stage and neither has first base experience.

In the upper minors, there’s no intriguing prospect. Mike Ford and Ryan McBroom have each hit well in Trenton and Scranton over the last couple years, though each is past prospect status in their late 20s. Could either go on a Voit or Shelley Duncan-style streak in the Majors? Sure! But sustained success is questionable, even if Ford could give you some two-way dreams.

If all else fails, what about outside the organization?

4. Trade or free agency

There was one big fish — Paul Goldschmidt — on the trade market this offseason and he’s been reeled in by St. Louis. The rest are slim pickings.

Free agency doesn’t do much better. Brad Miller is three years removed from a 30-homer season and hasn’t been all that productive since in addition to some fielding woes. Logan Forsythe played a little first for the Dodgers the last two years, but he hasn’t hit enough to justify a signing. Beyond them, want a flyer on Logan Morrison? Hanley Ramirez? Meh.

By July, there might be a few more first base options popping up. A Wilmer Flores or Justin Bour might be available, as could a reunion with new Marlin Neil Walker. The only name that stands out would be Giants first baseman Brandon Belt.

At 30, Belt is no longer a spring chicken and has struggled around injuries since his 2016 All-Star appearance, albeit while still posting above-average numbers. His plate discipline and glove play in any park and his lefty bat might play especially well at Yankee Stadium. He’s signed for three more seasons at $17.2 million per year, so he wouldn’t come cheap.

Conclusion

If the Yankees are going to finally get better-than-average production from first base, it’s going to be Voit or Bird. The team’s other options are few and murky at that, so riding it out with that combo is the hand the Bombers are forced to play.

It might turn out great! Bird is finally coming off a healthy offseason and Voit could be for real, at least to an extent.

But even if the Yankees need to carry a less-than-stellar first baseman, they can survive just like they have the last few years. Bird and Voit were key down the stretch the last two years and a power-hitting first baseman certainly helps, but it’s hardly a requirement for winning a championship. Still, it’d be nice if it works out.

Filed Under: Bench, Players Tagged With: DJ LeMahieu, Greg Bird, Luke Voit, Miguel Andujar, Mike Ford

Feb. 20th Spring Training Notes: Tulowitzki, Bird, Beltran

February 20, 2019 by Mike

Do you know what today is? Today is RAB’s 12th birthday. Ben, Joe, and I launched the site on this date way back in 2007. It feels like just yesterday but also somehow like a lifetime ago. I’d be lying if I said I thought the site would be around this long back when we launched. Thank you all for reading, no matter whether you’ve been with us 12 years or 12 minutes. I’ll shut up now. Here are today’s notes:

  • Aaron Boone said the Yankees are going to ease Troy Tulowitzki into things this spring. He won’t play his first game until sometime next week and it’ll be a while until he plays back-to-back days. Also, he’s going to play shortstop exclusively. “I didn’t get to play last year so I watched a lot of baseball and saw a lot of this team. They played some good baseball and came up just a little bit short. I want to help them finish it off with a championship,” said Tulowitzki, who broke the scoreboard in batting practice today. [Brendan Kuty, Bryan Hoch]
  • How does Greg Bird look this spring? “Good,” Boone said, adding there is “definitely a noticeable difference” in his swing and how he’s impacting the baseball. I sure hope so. Bird looked terrible late last year. I’m glad Bird looks good early in camp, but I need to see him hit in games and stay healthy for more than a few weeks at a time before I buy in. [Brendan Kuty, Bryan Hoch]
  • Carlos Beltran is in camp as a guest instructor. “There’s some things I saw today in the outfield that I told him we need to talk and some things I saw when he was swinging the bat which he did well. But in the long run, I want him to focus on things that are going to give him a consistent way to approach the game. So we were talking a little bit about that,” he said when asked about his work with Estevan Florial. Beltran said he’s working with Clint Frazier as well. [Brendan Kuty]

Only two more workout days until the Yankees begin their Grapefruit League season. At least the first four spring games will be televised, so that’s cool.

Filed Under: Spring Training Tagged With: Troy Tulowitzki

Five takeaways from the 2019 Yankees ZiPS projections

February 20, 2019 by Mike

Spring Training is underway and that means two things. One, baseball is back! Hooray for that. And two, prospect ranking season and projection season have arrived. We’ve already seen a ton of prospect rankings. Earlier this week, Dan Szymborski released his ZiPS projections for the 2019 Yankees. The fancy graphic above shows the team’s WAR projection by position. Spoiler. The Yankees project to be very good. I don’t think we needed ZiPS to tell us that.

Obligatory reminder: Projections are not predictions. They are an attempt to estimate the player’s current talent level. There are more projection systems out there than I care to count and they all go about it in different ways. Is one better than the other? Eh, not really. ZiPS is my preferred projection system so that’s what I’m going to write about. Here are five things that stand out to me about the 2019 Yankees ZiPS projections.

1. LeMahieu should play over Tulowitzki. Not sure you need a projection system to see this. Tulowitzki hasn’t played since July 2017 and, the last time he did play, he wasn’t very good. He hit .249/.300/.378 (79 wRC+) in 66 games before getting hurt. Also, Tulowitzki is 34 now. Even if he were perfectly healthy, he’s at the point where you’d expect age-related decline. Aren’t teams avoiding free agents this age? Not when they’re essentially free, I guess.

ZiPS pegs Tulowitzki as a below-average offense (77 OPS+) and league-average defense (+0 runs) player who projects out to +0.9 WAR per 600 plate appearances. It has LeMahieu as a below-average hitter as well (93 OPS+), but not that far below average, and it likes his defense too (+5 runs). The total package projects out to +2.2 WAR per 600 plate appearances. That is not an insignificant difference. Not in what could be a tight AL East race.

I totally understand why the Yankees are rolling the dice on Tulowitzki. I don’t understand why they’re seemingly so dedicated to him as their starting shortstop. “We’re planning on him playing shortstop and focusing solely there,” said Aaron Boone last week. In a perfect world the Yankees would give Tulowitzki a look in camp and a few weeks in the regular season. If he performs well, great, keep him. If not, I hope they don’t hesitate to move on. Not with LeMahieu ready to step in.

2. First base should be okay. Not great, but okay. PECOTA loves Luke Voit. That system has him as the 22nd best hitter in baseball in 2019. ZiPS is not that optimistic, though it sees a .264/.344/.474 (116 OPS+) batting line with 22 homers and +1.9 WAR in just under 500 plate appearances. That slash line looks like peak Joey Votto compared to what the Yankees have gotten at first base since Mark Teixeira’s last great year in 2015:

  • 2016: .212/.293/.380 (71 OPS+)
  • 2017: .244/.317/.444 (83 OPS+)
  • 2018: .234/.309/.453 (96 OPS+)

ZiPS has never been all that high on Greg Bird — it projected him for +1.9 WAR total from 2017-18 — and this year it projects him for a .224/.317/.444 (101 OPS+) line and +0.6 WAR in 350 plate appearance. Probably not good enough to start at first base for a contending team, in other words. First basemen collectively hit .253/.333/.438 (112 OPS+) last season, their worst season since 1953 and fifth worst season on record. They (relatively) stink right now. Voit’s projection is middle of the pack relative to the rest of the league. For the Yankees, middle of the pack at first base would be a massive upgrade over the last three years.

Slider class is in session. (Presswire)

3. A historic bullpen projection. The +7.9 WAR projection you see in the graphic atop the post is the highest bullpen projection ZiPS has ever spit out*. The previous record? The 2018 Yankees at +7.7 WAR. ZiPS projected the bullpen for +7.7 WAR last year and they finished the season at +9.7 WAR, making it the best bullpen in baseball history (per fWAR). (The Yankees also set a record with a 30.2% bullpen strikeout rate last year.)

* For what it’s worth, Szymborski says the bullpen projection would’ve been +8.3 WAR had the Yankees kept David Robertson rather than sign Adam Ottavino. Zack Britton (+0.8 WAR projected) over Robertson is the one that irks me though, not Ottavino (+0.9 WAR projected) over Robertson.

Bullpens are notoriously volatile but that doesn’t reduce the value of having high-end talent. Ottavino is more likely to be an above-average setup man this season than, say, Joe Harvey. Britton is a better bet to be a high ground ball lefty than Stephen Tarpley. When you’re the Yankees and you can throw money at the best available players, you should do it, and they did it with the bullpen. No, the bullpen is not guaranteed to meet (or beat) projections. ZiPS tells us they have an awful lot of relief talent though, and I’d rather bet on expensive talent than cobbling together seven or eight cheap arms and hoping for the best.

4. Does Green’s projection match reality? The best individual player projection in that stacked bullpen belongs not to five-time All-Star Aroldis Chapman or high-priced free agent Zack Britton. It belongs to Chad Green. ZiPS pegs Green as a true talent 2.70 ERA (2.77 FIP) pitcher with great strikeout (30.7%) and walk (6.4%) numbers. I have to think his +1.7 WAR projection is among the very best for relievers around the league this year.

ZiPS uses statistically similar players (weighing more recent seasons the heaviest) and aging curves to generate its projections. The system is aware of injuries but not necessarily how a player produces his results. For all ZiPS knows, Chapman throws 89 mph. In Green’s case, he is a one-pitch pitcher, and that one pitch was less effective last year than it was the year before. The breakdown of Green’s heater:

Avg Velocity Spin Rate Whiffs-per-Swing xwOBA
2017 95.8 mph 2,484 rpm 39.8% .216
2018 96.1 mph 2,444 rpm 27.9% .290

Same velocity, same spin, fewer whiffs, better contact allowed. It should be noted Green’s fastball still had a much better than average whiff rate (20.5% league average) and expected wOBA allowed (.347), but the pitch was not as effective as it was a year prior. Watching him pitch, it seemed to me the book was out on Green. Hitters knew they were likely getting a fastball and they geared up for it.

ZiPS doesn’t know Green lives and dies by his fastball. It doesn’t know he could use a better second pitch to keep hitters honest. He doesn’t need a Dellin Betances curveball or an Adam Ottavino slider. Just something good enough that hitters must respect it. I expect Green to be very good this season, but unless he comes up with a better slider or changeup, I don’t think he’ll be as good as he was in 2017, and maybe not as good as he was in 2018. He strikes me as the reliever most likely to fall short of his ZiPS projection. (Also, ZiPS says Green’s top statistical comp is Hall of Famer Rollie Fingers, and he should absolutely grow the mustache.)

5. Projections as a measure of depth. I like using ZiPS to estimate each team’s depth. Last year the Yankees had 27 (!) players projected for at least +1 WAR. I know a +1 WAR player isn’t all that exciting, but when you have a lot of them, your internal replacement level is pretty high. It means you have some good players stashed in Triple-A. You’re not scraping the bottom of the barrel when you need an injury replacement.

I like to look at each team’s depth at three levels: +1 WAR (okay players), +2 WAR (league average players), and +4 WAR (comfortably above-average players). Simply put, how many of each does each team have? The more the better, obviously. Here’s my spreadsheet (we’re still waiting for the White Sox and Padres projections) and I should note I removed unsigned free agents. The Red Sox don’t get credit for Craig Kimbrel, the Astros don’t get credit for Marwin Gonzalez and Dallas Keuchel, etc. Here are the Yankees and their ranks:

  • +1 WAR players: 22 (tenth most)
  • +2 WAR players: 12 (third most)
  • +4 WAR players: 3 (fifth most)

This isn’t a perfect measure because ZiPS doesn’t worry about doling out playing time (are Jed Lowrie and Todd Frazier both really going to get 450 at-bats?) and the timing can be not great (Edwin Encarnacion was still with Cleveland when the Indians ZiPS were released) but it’s a good ballpark estimate. I’m surprised the Yankees are only tenth in +1 WAR players, especially behind teams like the Twins and Diamondbacks. Huh. Only the Cardinals and Mets have more +2 WAR players. They have 13 apiece. With the farm system thinned out a bit, especially at the upper levels, the Yankees don’t have quite the +1 WAR depth as the last two years. The top of the roster is very strong though, and the Yankees have good depth, at least according to ZiPS.

Filed Under: Musings Tagged With: Chad Green, DJ LeMahieu, Greg Bird, Luke Voit, Troy Tulowitzki

The Low-Cost, Questionable-Reward Shortstop [2019 Season Preview]

February 20, 2019 by Domenic Lanza

(Presswire)

Five years ago, Troy Tulowitzki was the best shortstop in baseball. In 2014 he lead all shortstops in batting average, on-base percentage, slugging percentage, wRC+, and FanGraphs WAR; and he did so in just 375 PA, despite WAR being a counting stat. That represented the culmination of a six-year run in which he led all shortstops in wRC+ and WAR, while averaging just 113 games per season. So when the Rockies started shopping Tulowitzki in 2015, it was a big deal – even if he had difficulty staying healthy.

The package that the Blue Jays sent the Rockies in July of that year was not quite befitting of that level of talent, though. The Rockies acquired Jose Reyes, Jeff Hoffman (then a back-end of the top-hundred prospect), and two lottery ticket types. The combination of Tulowitzki’s injury history and remaining salary (a cool $100 MM when factoring in his $2 MM trade bonus) obviously cooled his market. And, with the benefit of hindsight, perhaps it wasn’t cool enough.

Tulowitzki ended up playing just 238 games for the Blue Jays, racking up 4.3 WAR along the way. Despite remaining in the organization for another fifteen months or so, Tulowitzki’s career with the team was effectively over after July 28, 2017, when he suffered ligament damage in his right ankle while running the bases. The recovery from that, as well as surgery to remove bone spurs from both heels, kept him out for all of 2018.

And now he’s a Yankee.

How did he look the last time he played?

The short answer: not good.

The slightly longer answer:

Tulowitzki was low-key good in 2016, slashing .254/.318/.443 (104 wRC+) and accumulating 3.0 WAR in 131 games. It was a far cry from his peak performance, but those are perfectly reasonable numbers for a starting shortstop (only eleven shortstops accumulated at least 3.0 WAR last year, for reference). The metrics still loved his defense, too, crediting him with 10 DRS and 5.7 UZR/150. Tulowitzki also had his token stint on the disabled list, missing twenty games with a right quadriceps strain.

And then he hit .249/.300/.378 (79 wRC+) in just 66 games in 2017, and hasn’t played since. His rate stats were almost universally career lows, and his -2.3 UZR/150 pegged him as a below-average (but not horrendous) defender. Put that all together, and you have a replacement-level player. And, again, he hasn’t played since then.

Is there a silver lining?

Not really. Tulowitzki’s barrel percentage, exit velocity, launch angle, and hard-hit percentage all cratered in 2017. Take a look:

To put it mildly, Tulowitzki earned every bit of his 79 wRC+ in 2017. He didn’t square pitches up, he wasn’t able to get underneath pitches, and he didn’t drive anything with any semblance of authority. The hope here would be to see something indicating that he got unlucky, but that’s simply not the case. Tulowitzki was a truly awful hitter in 2017.

I was hoping that I could pull out some selective endpoints to find some semblance of hope from 2017, given that he hit the disabled list with a pulled hamstring on April 22. However, he was hitting just .263/.295/.386 at that point in time, which isn’t all that far off from what he did the rest of the way. He showed intermittent flashes of goodness, to be sure – but they were few and far between.

What about his defense?

As I said above, Tulowitzki wasn’t necessarily bad with the glove in 2017. Defensive runs saved saw him as a scratch defender, and his -2.3 UZR/150 isn’t that far below-average. His arm strength has, according to most reports, never wavered, either. Factor in that he was playing with bone spurs in his heels for quite some time and spent much of the year with a bum hamstring, and everything starts to make sense. Based on all of this, I find myself optimistic that he can be a solid defender at short. I don’t think he’ll be great, or even good – but average defense at short is more than welcome.

What do the projections say?

  • ZiPS – .234/.293/.374, 11 HR, 1 SB, 77 OPS+, 346 PA
  • Steamer – .252/.311/.422, 9 HR, 1 SB, 98 wRC+, 245 PA
  • PECOTA – .260/.329/.429, 8 HR, 0 SB, 99 DRC+ 243 PA

ZiPS is basically saying that 2017 is Tulowitzki’s current talent level, whereas Steamer and PECOTA see 2016 as more informative. I would be extremely happy with the latter, as that would mean that a league-average-ish shortstop is holding the fort down while Didi Gregorius recuperates. It’s not ideal, obviously, and I can’t help but feel that the Yankees could have done much better – but it’s not bad.

My Take

I was inclined to throw in a shrugging emoji here, but that seems a bit too dismissive. After all, Tulowitzki was one of the best players in baseball five years ago, an average regular three years ago, and his workouts were impressive enough to garner interest from eleven teams. And, at a league-minimum salary, the risk is non-existent. That’s a worthwhile risk.

So what do I expect from Tulowitzki? Against my better judgment, I think that we might just see something close to his 2016. Maybe his heels were hurting his bat more than his glove; maybe the year off will help him refocus his approach; and maybe the Yankees identified something fixable in his swing. Or, alternatively, maybe I’m just blinded by how great Tulowitzki used to be, and the intrigue of a Derek Jeter fanboy manning shortstop for the Yankees. Either way, I think there’s room for a smidge of optimism as long as you’re not expecting a 2014-esque resurgence.

Filed Under: Players Tagged With: 2019 Season Preview, Troy Tulowitzki

Thoughts three days before the Yankees play their first Spring Training game

February 20, 2019 by Mike

(Presswire)

Spring Training is in full swing and three days from now the Yankees open their Grapefruit League season. The first four spring games will be televised. Hooray for that. Here are some thoughts.

1. I don’t have much to say about Manny Machado signing with the Padres. His (and Bryce Harper’s) free agency has been exhausting. There’s not much to say other than the Yankees should’ve signed Machado. He is a 26-year-old established star who fills a position of need and whose peak aligns perfectly with the Yankees’ championship window. The Yankees should always be in on players like that. Alas. What’s the plan on the left side of the infield long-term? Hope Miguel Andujar can be average at third base, and hope post-Tommy John surgery Didi Gregorius signs an extension and ages gracefully? Gleyber Torres is available as a shortstop backup plan, though that just opens up a hole at second. Machado at short until Gregorius returns, then Machado at third base made all the sense in the world. The championship window is as open as it’s going to get and hey, maybe the Yankees will surprise us all and sign Harper. I’m not counting on it. The Yankees developed a homegrown core and reset their luxury tax rate, then spent their free agent dollars on J.A. Happ, DJ LeMahieu, and a couple relievers. An offseason of half-measures.

2. The Yankees are a file-and-trial team — after filing salary arbitration figures, they cut off contract talks and go to a hearing — but they broke away from that to sign Luis Severino to his four-year extension last week, literally minutes before their scheduled arbitration hearing. Joel Sherman says the Yankees are only willing to discuss a multi-year extension after filing salary figures, not a one-year deal, so let’s call them a modified file-and-trial team. Anyway, after the Severino deal, the next question is: Who’s next? The Yankees have several extension worthy players on the roster. My hunch is this is their extension priority list:

  1. Aaron Hicks (free agent after 2019)
  2. Didi Gregorius (free agent after 2019)
  3. Aaron Judge (free agent after 2022)
  4. Dellin Betances (free agent after 2019)
  5. Gary Sanchez (free agent after 2022)
  6. Gleyber Torres (free agent after 2024)
  7. Miguel Andujar (free agent after 2023)

Who plays center field after 2019 if not Hicks? Judge can play center here and there but I wouldn’t want him out there full-time. Ditto Clint Frazier. Re-signing 36-year-old Brett Gardner and putting him in center full-time gets a nope from me. If they need to replace Hicks, I’d rather the Yankees roll the dice on a buy-low guy like Byron Buxton than sign someone like Leonys Martin. They should just re-sign Hicks though. He’s in his prime and he’s one of the best center fielders in the game. Sir Didi’s elbow complicates things but the Yankees love him and I think they want to keep him long-term. I have Betances below Judge only because Dellin can be unpredictable and he’ll be 32 on Opening Day 2020. Maybe Betances will take a sweetheart deal right now, something like three years at $9M per season. Otherwise I think the Yankees will wait. As for Judge, the sooner the Yankees sign him, the larger the discount, in theory. Should he repeat his 2018 season in 2019, minus the wrist injury, he’ll be in line for something like $10M in his first trip through arbitration next winter. It’s not crazy to think his arbitration salaries could go $10M to $20M to $30M. How willing are the Yankees to give Judge an extension now and raise his luxury tax number this year — as far as we know, neither Judge nor any other pre-arbitration-eligible player has signed a 2019 contract yet — because an extension would push them into the second luxury tax tier, meaning every $1 they give Judge will equal $1.32 in salary plus luxury tax. Keep in mind Judge already has lucrative endorsement deals with Adidas and Pepsi. Locking in that first big baseball contract may not be a top priority. My hunch is, unless Judge is willing to take a discount too good to pass up (five years at $15M per season?), the Yankees will ride out his final dirt cheap pre-arbitration year before getting serious about an extension next year. The priority is likely the impending free agents, specifically Hicks and to a slightly lesser extent Gregorius.

3. The Yankees have quite a few Comeback Player of the Year candidates, huh? I didn’t realize it until I looked over the roster the other day. Troy Tulowitzki hasn’t played a big league game in nearly 20 months now and that makes him the team’s top Comeback Player of the Year candidate. Then again, Gregorius is coming to take Tulowitzki’s job at some point, which will throw a wrench into things. Danny Farquhar would be the top Comeback Player of the Year candidate on most teams but it’s not certain he’ll ever even pitch for the Yankees this year. The bullpen is stacked, so he could go to Triple-A and wind up with another club at midseason after using the opt-out clause I assume is in his contract. Is Gary Sanchez a Comeback Player of the Year candidate? Or is he just a young player who had a sophomore slump? I feel like a player needs to have a longer and more established track record to win the award. Not just one great year and two otherworldly months. With a strong season though, I could definitely see Sanchez getting some Comeback Player of the Year love. Jordan Montgomery will return too late in the season to make a run at the award but, if he’s great after returning and helps the Yankees reach the postseason, he’ll get support. I suppose we could throw Tommy Kahnle into the mix, though it seems unlikely a middle reliever will win it. Jonny Venters did last year but that’s only after coming back from three (!) Tommy John surgeries and a fourth elbow procedure. I don’t think Judge (injury) or Severino (bad second half) are Comeback Player of the Year candidates. They were too good overall. Frazier is coming back from concussion issues but he’s not an established big leaguer, so he can’t win the award. He’d just be a young player breaking out. Tulowitzki and I guess Sanchez give the Yankees two potential Comeback Player of the Year candidates. Farquhar’s a possibility and Montgomery is a long shot. Two Yankees have been named Comeback Player of the Year (Jason Giambi in 2005 and Mariano Rivera in 2013) but they haven’t had a serious candidate for the award since Alex Rodriguez in 2015 — Prince Fielder won it and deserved to win it that year, sparing MLB from giving the award to a guy coming back from a performance-enhancing drug suspension — and that will hopefully change this year. Tulowitzki and Sanchez battling for the award would be a good thing for the Yankees. (My money is on Miguel Cabrera and Yu Darvish winning the two Comeback Player of the Year awards.)

4. I make sure to mention Tyler Wade whenever discussing the open bench spot and yet he still feels like a forgotten man to me, so much so that I totally forgot about him in my top 30 prospects list two weeks ago. Well, more accurately, I incorrectly assumed he exhausted his prospect eligibility and didn’t bother to check. That’s my bad. Wade only has 124 career big league at-bats, just short of the 130 at-bat rookie limit, so he is prospect-eligible. (Wade exhausted his rookie eligibility through service time last year.) Anyway, I went back and added him to the top 30 list, so go check that out. As for the open bench spot, I think Wade might get it by default. With Jacoby Ellsbury still not healthy, Wade’s primary competition is Clint Frazier and Greg Bird. Frazier missed so much time with injuries last year that sending him to Triple-A for regular at-bats makes more sense — at least initially — than using him part-time or in a platoon role in the big leagues. No matter how much you want them to, the Yankees won’t bench Brett Gardner for Frazier. Not at the outset of the season. Triple-A is the best place for Frazier to start the year given how much time he missed last year. Thairo Estrada is in a similar situation. Also, Aaron Boone hinted last week that the Yankees won’t carry both Bird and Luke Voit on the roster. Two first base only guys isn’t a great idea in the age of eight-man bullpens and three-man benches. That leaves the final bench spot to Wade, Kyle Higashioka (nah), a non-roster invitee (maybe?), or a player yet to be acquired (probably not happening). Whoever gets the final bench spot doesn’t figure to play a whole lot. When an outfielder needs to sit, Giancarlo Stanton will slot in. When an infielder needs to sit, DJ LeMahieu will slot in. Given the current roster, the final bench guy is an emergency player, not someone the Yankees figure to use strategically all that often. Wade can at least run and play defense, and my guess is the Yankees are willing to let him sit on the bench for days at a time than they are Bird or Frazier or even Estrada. All that seems to point to him getting the final bench spot, at least on Opening Day.

(Presswire)

5. During his start-of-spring press conference last week Boone said he went to the Dominican Republic to visit Gary Sanchez over the winter. He also told James Wagner that he went to Adam Ottavino’s Harlem pitching lab to watch him throw a bullpen. A few weeks ago it was reported Boone visited Miguel Andujar in the Dominican Republic to check out his defensive work. Joe Girardi was a good manager, but I feel like we’ve heard more about Boone visiting players this year than we did during Girardi’s entire ten-year managerial stint with the Yankees. Maybe Boone is just more willing to talk about those visits. Girardi was the manager for a decade though. You’d think news of an offseason visit would get out at some point. I spent some time googling and found nothing. According to Brian Cashman and Hal Steinbrenner, the single biggest reason the Yankees parted ways with Girardi was concern about communication. They have a young team and were worried the manager wasn’t getting through to them. Maybe this is unfair to say, but Boone is building relationships with his players in a way Girardi never seemed to. Boone had some terrible moments in the postseason last year. Believe me, I know. By and large though, he and Girardi were carbon copies on the field during the regular season. Same lineup construction, they lined up their bullpen the same way, they rested players plenty. That’s probably because the front office has more of a hand in things than we realize. The difference between the two is what happens behind the scenes, and this offseason Boone traveled around to meet with his players. I don’t remember Girardi doing that. Will it equal wins on the field? Who knows. The Yankees clearly believe it will help the team though.

6. The other day I linked off to a video of James Paxton throwing a bullpen session, and in the background you could see the Yankees had a camera set up with their analytics folks pulling data. Spin rate, spin axis, all that stuff. George King and Dan Martin say it’s an Edgertronic camera — the Yankees have one in the Yankee Stadium bullpen as well — one of several portal high-speed cameras that capture data. Rapsodo’s another popular one. Mike Petriello started a Twitter thread showing different teams using these cameras in their early Spring Training bullpen sessions. With all due respect, the news is not the teams that are using Edgertronic or Rapsodo. It’s the teams that aren’t. In 2019, every single team should be using this equipment, otherwise they’re in the Stone Age. How the data is analyzed and applied differs from team to team, and that’s what separates great teams from the not so great teams. At a bare minimum though, every single club should be collecting this information. I’m glad the Yankees have their Edgertronic set up in the George M. Steinbrenner Field bullpen area now. It’d be more notable if they didn’t though, and I’d love to learn more about how the Yankees (and other clubs) are using the data they’re capturing. Good luck getting them to peel back the curtain on that.

7. Now that all 30 teams have opened Spring Training, we have a pretty good sample of team and league executives saying silly (if not infuriating) things to defend the league-wide lack of spending. Some examples:

  • Cubs owner Tom Ricketts: “We don’t have any more (money to spend). We have to have flexibility in the future.” [Bob Nightengale]
  • Braves GM Alex Anthopoulos: “Did we promise we were going to spend more money, or did we promise we were going to have more flexibility?” [Jeff Schultz, subs. req’d]
  • Commissioner Rob Manfred: “I reject the notion that payroll is a good measure for how much a team is trying or how successful that team is going to be.” [Jeff Passan]

Executives around the league have quickly become defensive about their spending and, frankly, these comments aren’t just an insult (how stupid do they think fans are?), they create other questions. What’s wrong with the Cubs’ business model that they can’t afford to increase payroll three years after a World Series windfall? What’s the point of payroll flexibility if the Braves aren’t going to spend it when their core is young and cheap? If the commissioner rejects the notion that payroll corresponds to success, why does the league need what is literally called the Competitive Balance Tax (aka the luxury tax)? The Yankees aren’t exempt from this either. In a recent MLB.com video, Hal Steinbrenner said the Yankees are passing on Manny Machado and Bryce Harper because their biggest area of need this offseason was “not an infielder or an outfielder, it was pitching.” Great. So why did they sign two infielders and an outfielder, and pass on the best free agent starting pitcher then? MLBPA chief Tony Clark issued a statement responding to Manfred’s comments and noted MLB is “operating in an environment in which an increasing number of clubs appear to be making little effort to improve their rosters, compete for a championship or justify the price of a ticket.” I’m glad he mentioned ticket prices. The union needs to get fans on their side and pointing out they are paying more than ever for tickets even though only a few teams are trying to win is a good start. Team and league executives are being defensive about their lack of spending to the point where they’re making pretty dumb comments and treating fans like idiots, which tells me they hear the complaints. Will that change their spending habits? Goodness no. They’ll live with bad press in exchange for more dollars. Ultimately, I don’t see anything changing until every team has a reason — has a need — to try to compete. Being bad is too profitable nowadays.

Filed Under: Musings

Feb. 19th Spring Training Notes: Judge, Britton, Frazier

February 19, 2019 by Mike

In case you somehow missed it earlier, Manny Machado agreed to a deal with the Padres. It’s a ten-year deal worth $300M, and it includes an opt-out after year five. Technically, the Yankees were not outbid by the Padres — the Padres! — because they reportedly never made an offer. I will try to avoid getting Mad Online. Here are the day’s notes from Tampa:

  • Not surprisingly, various Yankees didn’t have much to say about the Machado deal. “San Diego signed a really good player,” Aaron Boone said, which is way more than I expected seeing how Machado’s contract is not official yet. [Bryan Hoch]
  • Aaron Judge held a standard start-of-spring press conference today and said his fractured right wrist is completely healed. “It’s 100%. It feels like it never even happened,” he said. He added he hasn’t heard anything about a possible contract extension. “I’m focused on the season,” he said. That doesn’t mean his agent isn’t focused on an extension, of course. [Coley Harvey, Bryan Hoch]
  • Zack Britton was the only projected big league pitcher to throw live batting practice today. Trevor Stephan faced hitters as well and Clint Frazier took him deep. Here’s the video. Make sure you listen with your speakers up to hear that crack of the bat. [Bryan Hoch]
  • If you’re curious, Brendan Kuty has the day’s batting practice groups. Don’t read anything into the groups. They don’t tell you who has a leg up on a roster spot or anything like that.

We’ve reached the dog days of Spring Training. Position players have arrived and full squad workouts are underway, but the first Grapefruit League game is still four days away. Ugh. Anyway, the first four spring games will be televised.

Filed Under: Spring Training Tagged With: Aaron Judge

The third baseman with something to prove [2019 Season Preview]

February 19, 2019 by Derek Albin

(Presswire)

What’s left to prove after Miguel Andujar finished second in Rookie of the Year voting last year? Avoiding a sophomore slump, sure, but for Andujar, it’s much more than just repeating his impressive offensive performance from last season. After a winter of the fanbase clamoring for Manny Machado in pinstripes and constant questions about Andujar’s defense, the heat is on.

Signing Machado made (and still makes) sense for the Yankees. He could have taken over at third base while Andujar moved elsewhere. Instead, the Yankees have decided to go with Andujar at the hot corner once more. Even if this is a matter of Hal Steinbrenner simply not wanting to open the checkbook, it’s still a vote of confidence for Miggy from the front office. Perhaps the main reason he’s getting another shot is his unparalleled work ethic. Still, hard work won’t make the scrutiny go away. Especially not after the team essentially admitted their concerns about his defense by sitting him in Game Four of the ALDS. Everything he does in the field is going to be under the microscope and he may feel some pressure to prove the Yankees right for passing on Machado.

Can Andujar will his way to improve defensively?

Say what you want about Andujar’s fielding, but there’s no question that he’s trying to get better. It’s not difficult to find an article that quotes someone with or close to the team who lauds his effort. That’s fine and dandy, and I’d rather have that than someone who doesn’t care, but the odds are still against Andujar. I have a piece in the works for Baseball Prospectus that looks at some of the worst defensive fielding seasons for third baseman and how those players did in following years. Spoiler: the vast, vast majority do not get better. Chances are Andujar won’t be the exception, no matter how great his work ethic is.

It’s not as if Andujar doesn’t have the physical tools to play the position. He’s in good shape and seemingly athletic enough. His arm is top notch as well. However, his range has held him back. I wrote about the work he’s put in to improve his first step and a somewhat silly idea for him to add range. He’s got a long way to go whatever the solution may be, if there even is one. Below are his ranks out of 132 third base seasons since Inside Edge data is available, which grades the probability of making certain plays. This is a pretty good proxy for range and first reaction. It’s not pretty:

Inside Edge Fielding 10 – 40% 40 – 60% 60 – 90% 90 – 100%
Andujar’s Rank
(out of 132 player seasons)
121st 132nd 116th 132nd

A problem for people like you and me is that we won’t be able to know if Andujar is rangier until the end of the season, when we have enough data. We’ll basically have to take the Yankees word for it if he truly has improved. There’s no real way for us to notice a difference on television.

This is where not signing Machado becomes a huge risk. If Andujar doesn’t improve, the team lost out on getting one of the best defensive third basemen. It’s not like Andujar’s bat couldn’t play elsewhere, albeit it being more valuable at third. Maybe the Yanks get another swing in free agency with Nolan Arenado, but the recent actions of the Steinbrenners aren’t inspiring. The Yankees are basically going all-in with a bad hand.

Will the walks come and is his power for real?

Batted balls need to avoid fielders’ gloves for Andujar to be successful as a hitter because he walks so rarely. Last season, he reached on balls only 4.1 percent of the time. That’s totally fine if he can repeat his .316 BABIP and .527 SLG. However, if he runs into some bad luck with at ‘em balls, suddenly his value craters.

Andujar’s expected batting average was in the 83rd percentile of all hitters last season, which is a good indication that he didn’t have a ton of BABIP luck. It’s why he was able to maintain a respectable on-base percentage (.328) despite a lack of walks. He’ll need that to continue in 2019.

What’s a tad alarming were his exit velocity and hard hit percentage. They were close to middle of the pack last season. I don’t think anyone expected Andujar to hit 47 doubles, 27 homers, and record a .527 slugging percentage, but the underlying data is still surprising. It seemed like he crushed liners left and right based on the eye test. I guess not.

Chances are that Andujar will not repeat his power output from last season. And that’s not a bad thing! It was a pretty awesome season. Nonetheless, drawing a few more walks could help mitigate that, but it doesn’t seem like he’ll ever be a high on-base guy. His likely offensive output is probably a bit more volatile given his reliance on batted ball luck, but he should still be a plus at the dish. After all, it’s not like he came completely out of nowhere. He did this (though with less power) in the minors.

The nice thing about hitting in this lineup is that Andujar has some wiggle room for error. He hit sixth, seventh, or eighth most of the time last season, and I’d expect that to continue in 2019. The offense won’t fall apart if Andujar is unable to repeat last year.

Projections

PECOTA: 558 PA, .271/.319/.461 (105 DRC+), 22 HR, -7.1 FRAA, 0.9 WARP

Steamer: 571 PA, .279/.321/.481 (115 wRC+), 24 HR, -9.5 Def, 2.0 WAR

There’s good news and bad news here. The plus is that both projection systems think that Andujar’s defense will improve. They still think he’ll be bad, but not horrific like he was last year (-15.2 FRAA, -15.5 Def). The bad news is that both forecast his power to shrink a fair amount. The home runs are expected to dip slightly, but both don’t think he’ll be a doubles machine again. He’s still an above average hitter by both measures, but not necessarily a superb one.

Projections aren’t gospel so there’s no need to be up in arms if you think they’re low on Andujar. They’re a good reference point for what we should reasonably expect out of him this season. Keep in mind that there’s only one year of major league data to go off of for Miggy. If he proves that he’s an outlier when it comes to hitting for extra bases, he’ll beat the projections.

Final thoughts

It’s pretty easy to nitpick Andujar’s game. I know I just pointed out a handful of his flaws, but there are guys who turn out to be exceptions to the rule. Not saying Andujar will be one of them, but maybe he does make significant strides defensively, maybe his aggressive approach is fine, or maybe his power isn’t something he lucked into last season. Those are quite a few ifs, but the talent is there.

I can’t help but think I should be writing this preview as a designated hitter and/or first baseman. If he’s a 128 wRC+ hitter like he was last season, the bat plays at either of those spots. I would get giving Andujar another opportunity to improve defensively at third, but with Machado available, it seems irresponsible not to take advantage of the opportunity. I really hope that Andujar proves me wrong, but I can’t help but wonder if the Yankees will regret this decision pretty quickly in 2019.

Filed Under: Players Tagged With: 2019 Season Preview, Miguel Andujar

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • …
  • 4059
  • Next Page »

RAB Thoughts on Patreon

Mike is running weekly thoughts-style posts at our "RAB Thoughts" Patreon. $3 per month gets you weekly Yankees analysis. Become a Patron!

Got A Question For The Mailbag?

Email us at RABmailbag (at) gmail (dot) com. The mailbag is posted Friday mornings.

RAB Features

  • 2019 Season Preview series
  • 2019 Top 30 Prospects
  • 'What If' series with OOTP
  • Yankees depth chart

Search RAB

Copyright © 2025 · River Avenue Blues